Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework

By Mark A. McDaniel, Gilles O. Einstein. 2000

1,184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a9c7e475bc8195a8b0990005f17dd7fceb29eb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Breaking and creating habits on the working floor : A field- experiment on the power of implementation intentions (2006, background): “…cup after having formed the implementation intention to recycle, this person may be automatically reminded about the new behavior, and as a consequence, directs oneself to the recycling boxes (see also recent work on prospective memory for a similar line of reasoning, McDaniel & Einstein, 2000).”
A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. (2004, methodology): “This evidence goes against the hypothesis that age effects will be greater on tests of prospective memory (e.g., Craik, 1986; McDaniel & Einstein, 2000).”
How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world (2010, background): “We selected situations rather than times as cues, because prospective memory research indicates that situations permit external cueing of an intended action whereas time cues require monitoring to identify the time to act (McDaniel & Einstein, 2000).”
Interruptions to workflow: Their relationship with irritation and satisfaction with performance, and the mediating roles of time pressure and mental demands (2013, background): “All this puts demands on attentional processes and working memory (prospective memory, McDaniel & Einstein, 2000; Monsell, 2003).”
A Review of Virtual Week for Prospective Memory Assessment: Clinical Implications (2009, background): “However, McDaniel and Einstein (2007) recently concluded that most PM tasks lack reliability, with some tasks as low as 20%.”
Polychronicity and Multitasking: A Diary Study at Work (2015, background): “…decrements can be explained not only by the cognitive costs of resuming the main task but also by prospective memory failure (Baethge & Rigotti, 2013; Czerwinski, Horvitz, & Wilhite, 2004; Dismukes, 2012; McDaniel & Einstein, 2000): The person forgets what the next step to be executed is.”
Variation in Cognitive Failures: An Individual Differences Investigation of Everyday Attention and Memory Failures. (2012, background): “…predicted by laboratory PM tasks (as well as the other laboratory measures) suggests the possibility that many everyday prospective memory tasks can be accomplished via relatively automatic processing rather than more effortful processing (Einstein & McDaniel, 2008; McDaniel & Einstein, 2000).”
The Effects of Age, Ability, and Memory Monitoring on Prospective Memory Task Performance (2002, background): “McDaniel and Einstein (2000) have put forward a multiprocess framework to explain how successful prospective memory performance might be achieved.”
Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions☆ (2005, background): “Based on the foregoing, McDaniel and his colleagues are correct in their multiprocess view that prospective memory sometimes requires resources and sometimes does not ( McDaniel & Einstein, 2000; McDaniel et al., 2004).”
The development of prospective memory in children: An executive framework (2014, methodology): “As noted earlier, the presence of PM–OT tradeoffs supports theories of PM, such as the PAM model (Smith, 2003) and the multiprocess framework (McDaniel & Einstein, 2000): These theories posit that at least under some circumstances controlled executive processes are necessary for PM and a demanding…”
The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults (2003, background): “One clear possibility is that prospective memory in adulthood involves a range of processes that depend on the particular instantiation of the prospective memory task (cf., Einstein & McDaniel, 1990; McDaniel & Einstein, 2000).”
Promoting habit formation (2013, background): “Firstly, enactment of a plan is most likely if the cue to action is an event, rather than a time-based cue, because a time cue requires ongoing monitoring in order to identify the appropriate opportunity to act, whereas an event-based cue does not (McDaniel & Einstein, 2000).”