The teleological notion of ‘function’
By Karen Neander. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Krista Casler
- Hannes Rakoczy
- Stephen A. Butterfill
- Ian A. Apperly
- Shannon Spaulding
- Tad Zawidzki
- P. Godfrey‐Smith
- Deborah Kelemen
Citations in the corpus
- The Gene Ontology and the meaning of biological function (2017, unknown): “In biology, as explained by Millikan [3] and Neander [4], this is tantamount to asking the following: For which of its effects was it selected during evolution? One obvious advantage of the selected effect definition is that it explicitly incorporates evolutionary considerations, and demands that a ”
- Developmental Continuity in Teleo-Functional Explanation: Reasoning about Nature Among Romanian Romani Adults (2008, background): “, self-serving functional explanations of biological properties) (see Wright, 1973; Neander, 1991).”
- Symposium on S. Butterfill and I. Apperly, "How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind" (2013, background): “…construal of function, for an action to have the function of bringing about g would be for actions of this type to have brought about g in the past and for this action to occur in part because of this fact (see further Godfrey-Smith 1996; Millikan 1984; Neander 1991; Price 2001; Wright 1976).”
- A Modern History Theory of Functions (1994, background): “13This suggestion is made cautiously-perhaps all these additional requirements are ill-advised (Neander 1991b p. 183).”
- Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear (2002, unknown): “13 See, for example, Godfrey-Smith (1994), Neander (1991) and Plantinga (1993).”