How To Assess and Interpret Survey Psychometrics
By M. Litwin. 2002
213 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29ee1dc90d79668949bac548ac699f77a49a3061
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Gregorio Rodríguez-Gómez
- María Soledad Ibarra-Sáiz
- David Boud
- Alexander Weinreb
- Judy Murnan
- J. Price
- D. Carless
- Emma Medland
In Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Gregorio Rodríguez-Gómez
- María Soledad Ibarra-Sáiz
- David Boud
- Alexander Weinreb
- Judy Murnan
- J. Price
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Gregorio Rodríguez-Gómez
- María Soledad Ibarra-Sáiz
- David Boud
- Alexander Weinreb
- Judy Murnan
- J. Price
Citations in the corpus
- Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement (2020, methodology): “Of the various methods available (Johnson and Morgan 2016; Litwin 2003), we chose to use the group consensus option in which the experts consulted arrive at a final product on which they all agree, following an incremental and iterative process in several cycles.”
- The Limitations of Stranger-Interviewers in Rural Kenya (2006, background): “The key problem in estimating this type of test–retest reliability is that many characteristics, behaviors, and attitudes can legitimately change between two waves, especially where, as in this case, there is a lengthy gap between the waves (Litwin 2003).”
- Research Limitations and the Necessity of Reporting Them (2004, background): “The absence of one or more of an instrument’s psychometric properties (e.g., established validity and reliability) is one such threat to internal validity (Litwin, 2003).”