Studying users' computer security behavior: A health belief perspective

By Boon-Yuen Ng, Atreyi Kankanhalli, Yunjie (Calvin) Xu. Decision Support Systems, 2009

631 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/299060bcda3793c6b564d8f0b429472777fe1e43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

What Do Systems Users Have to Fear? Using Fear Appeals to Engender Threats and Fear that Motivate Protective Security Behaviors (2015, methodology): “Another study (Ng et al. 2009) used HBM to explain employees’ secure e-mail behavior.”
Scaling the Security Wall: Developing a Security Behavior Intentions Scale (SeBIS) (2015, methodology): “, [47, 9, 30]), which researchers have used to offer recommendations.”
Understanding Security Behaviors in Personal Computer Usage: A Threat Avoidance Perspective (2010, neutral): “Prior research has demonstrated that users are more motivated to perform IT security behaviors as the level of their self-efficacy increases (Ng et al., 2009; Woon et al., 2005; Workman et al., 2008).”
The Impact of Organizational Commitment on Insiders’ Motivation to Protect Organizational Information Assets (2015, background): “Although technology is vital to organizational information protection, insiders’ behaviors ultimately determine the success of security initiatives [25, 69]; technology can extend protection only so far before the control of information must be entrusted to insiders [95].”
Security awareness of computer users: A phishing threat avoidance perspective (2014, background): “Previous research has revealed that individuals are more motivated to perform IT security related behaviozrs as the level of their self-efficacy increases (Kaiser, 1974; Ng et al., 2009; Woon et al., 2005).”
An Enhanced Fear Appeal Rhetorical Framework: Leveraging Threats to the Human Asset Through Sanctioning Rhetoric (2015, background): “Information security managers and other organizational executives continue to struggle with enforcing policies designed to protect assets from intentional or accidental information security violations by an organization's insiders (D'Arcy et al. 2009; Ng et al. 2009; Puhakainen and Siponen 2010).”
Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition (2014, methodology): “Thus, employees with positive beliefs about their organisation’s ISSP will have favourable tendencies to comply with such rules and guidelines [32,42].”