A Typology of Situational Factors: Impact on Salesperson Decision-Making about Ethical Issues

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going (2008, result): “The research on the connection between gender and behavior is also mixed, but is skewed such that most studies have found that women behave more ethically (eg, Chung & Trivedi, 2003 ; Glover, Bumpus, Logan, & Ciesla, 1997 ; Ross & Robertson, 2003 ; Sankaran & Bui, 2003 ).”
Blind forces (2014, result): “…should reduce the incidence of unethical workplace behavior and, indeed, empirical results in the published literature generally support this relationship (e.g., Baker et al., 2006; Marta et al., 2001; Paolillo & Vitell, 2002; Ross & Robertson, 2003; Schaubroeck et al., 2012; Vitell et al., 2003).”
The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, background): “Industry type has sometimes been found to have an impact on individual ethical decisions (e.g. Ergeneli and Arıkan 2002; Forte 2004; Roozen et al. 2001; e.g. Shafer et al. 2001) and, again, is a typical control variable in organizational research.”