The learning dimension of evaluation use

By H. Preskill, R. T. Torres. 2000

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/286dbbe46e40ce95ff36a12cf49d15493e6785a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. S. Taut
2. D. Fleischer
3. Christina A. Christie
4. Marvin C. Alkin

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. D. Fleischer
2. S. Taut
3. Christina A. Christie
4. Marvin C. Alkin

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluation Use (2009, background): “Soon thereafter, decision makers began to scrutinize the evaluation studies being conducted, leading to criticism that evaluation findings were not being used (Preskill & Torres, 2000).”
• UNBUNDLING EVALUATION USE (2002, background): “Others, like Preskill and Torres (2000), focus more specifically on the learning effect that the evaluation process has at the individual. team, and organizational levels.”
• Evaluation and Organizational Learning: Past, Present, and Future (2001, unknown): “…the ongoing learning of the organization as a whole (see Forss, Cracknell, & Samset, 1994; Owen & Lambert, 1995; Owen & Rogers, 1999; Patton, 1997; Preskill & Torres, 1999, 2000; Russ-Eft & Preskill, 2001; Shulha, 2000; Sonnichsen, 1999; Torres, 1991; Torres, Preskill, & Piontek, 1996; Weiss,…”