Dialectics between cultural and cross‐cultural psychology

By H. Triandis. 2000

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/286bda771cfb59db4bcdc83279461f8674270f2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. A. Church
2. N. Erdoğan
3. Akane Zusho
4. Karen Clayton
5. Ara Norenzayan
6. Avi Kaplan
7. M. Maehr
8. E. Suh

In Social Psychology

1. Steven J. Heine
2. Ara Norenzayan
3. Akane Zusho
4. A. Church
5. Karen Clayton
6. H. Triandis
7. Avi Kaplan
8. E. Suh

Citations in the corpus

• Individualism-collectivism and personality. (2001, background): “Triandis (2000) argued that it is desirable to use all three approaches and look for convergence.”
• Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case (2009, background): “For instance, Bechtel et al. (2006) indicated that their results “support the idea of particular psychologies that are culture-dependent as Triandis (2000) and Yang (2000), among others, suggest.””
• The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory (2007, background): “The increasing focus on cultural processes—within and across cultures (cf. Bruner, 1996; Schwartz, White, & Lutz, 1992; Stigler, Shweder, & Herdt, 1990; Kitayama & Markus, 1994; Strauss & Quinn, 1997; Triandis, 2000)— highlights the importance and necessity of employing new methods.”
• Culturalizing Achievement Goal Theory and Research (2011, background): “Triandis (2000) summarized these differences along five dimensions.”
• Cultural influences on personality. (2002, background): “Triandis (2000a) has proposed a wide range of factors that might contribute to cultural differences in subjective well-being.”
• Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research (2008, background): “Last, Triandis (2000) stated that when using cross-cultural approaches, psychologists obtain data in two or more cultures assuming the constructs under investigation exist in all of the cultures studied.”
• Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology (2009, background): “…with their emphasis on the identification of theories, constructs and methods that are embedded within specific cultural contexts (Church & Katigbak, 2002; Kim, Yang, & Hwang, 2006), share many scientific and philosophical perspectives with cultural psychologists (Triandis, 2000; Yang, 2000).”
• Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know? (2005, background): “…available in the cross-cultural literature, including back-translation, emically (locally ) derived measurement, multimethod observations, and establishing equivalency of meaning in control conditions (for reviews, see Berry, Poortinga, & Pandey, 1997; Okazaki & Sue, 1995; Triandis, 2000).”