Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Transfer mechanisms and knowledge transfer: The cooperative competency perspective (2014, background): “…Beimborn, 2009; Santoro & Saparito, 2006), social ties (e.g., Bond, Houston, & Tang, 2008; Chen, Shih, & Yang, 2009; Yli-Renko et al., 2001) and form of alliance (e.g., Björkman et al., 2004; Chen, 2004; Cho & Lee, 2004; Lee & Cavusgil, 2006; Lyles & Salk, 1996) affect knowledge transfer outcomes.”
Internal integration as a pre-condition for external integration in global sourcing: A social capital perspective (2014, background): “Furthermore, because mutual trust and commitment play a major role in the relational component (e.g. Lee and Cavusgil, 2006), the relational dimension is delineated into trust and commitment.”
Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects (2017, result): “This result is similar with several studies, for example, Lee and Cavusgil (2006) argue that the relational governance, as opposed to the contractual governance, is more effective in alliance performance; Liu et al. (2009) conclude the same result in relationship performance, this paper confirms…”
Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence (2018, background): “Still, many of these collaborative relationships are often unsuccessful [8].”