Country-level investments and the effect of corruption -- some empirical evidence
By M. Habib, Leon Zurawicki. 2001
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2685ca19a3a565f839343ead44ffc13935e60d32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Sociology and Political Science
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Gravity Equations; Workhorse or Trojan Horse in Explaining Trade and FDI Patterns Across Time and Space? (2010, unknown): “Anderson (1979) was the first to provide strong theoretical underpinnings of the gravity model, followed by Bergstrand (1985), Helpman and Krugman (1985) and Deardorff (1998).”
- Cross-border takeovers, corruption, and related aspects of governance (2006, unknown): “Kobrin (1976), Habib and Zurawicki (2001), and Wei (2000a) report a”
- Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs' ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market (2007, methodology): “The corruption index was computed using Transparency International’s corruption index to identify transparency distance between home and host countries (as suggested by Habib & Zurawicki, 2001, 2002).”
- Corruption and Human Development (2006, background): “Examining the impact of corruption on foreign direct investment (FDI), Wei (2000), Drabek and Payne (1999), and Habib and Zurawicki (2001) find that corruption is a deterrent factor for foreign investors.”
- Corruption Distance and FDI Flows into Latin America (2015, background): “This result suggests that firms based in countries with low corruption see corruption as a high and costly risk, and hence, avoid it abroad (Habib & Zurawicki, 2001).”
- Organized crime, the quality of local institutions and FDI in Italy: A panel data analysis (2011, background): “…“governing infrastructures”—includes, for instance, the ease with which a company can be set up, government effectiveness, security of property rights, the efficiency of the judicial systems and the lack of corruption (Habib and Zurawicki, 2001; Bénassy-Quéré et al., 2007; Daude and Stein, 2007).”