Seven indicators to measure decent work: An international comparison
By David Bescond, Anne. Chataignier, F. Mehran. 2003
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/264a576ccdef77bba705234fca91716d954ed29e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- K. Sehnbruch
- R. Bustillo
- Enrique Fernández-Macías
- J. Antón
- Fernando Esteve
- F. Cnossen
- Milena Nikolova
- T. Dundon
In Political Science and International Relations
In Public Administration
Citations in the corpus
- E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators (2011, background): “DWI-4 Decent Work Index-4 Developed and developing countries Bescond et al. (2003) ILO databases”
- The Quality of Employment (QoE) in nine Latin American countries: A multidimensional perspective (2020, unknown): “However, the articles published here required data that is not easily available in developing countries as is illustrated by Bescond and Mehran (2003), who proposes seven indicators for measuring decent work deprivations, which are then summed up by means of a simple average.”
- The quality of employment and decent work: definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates (2014, methodology): “In the same volume, Bescond et al. (2003) propose a different methodology based on seven different Decent Work indicators, while Bonnet, Figueiredo and Standing (2003) present the establishment of a family of Decent Work indicators from different sources that take into account various aspects of…”