Effects of Family Size for Complex Words

By R. Bertram, R. Harald Baayen, Rob Schreuder. 2000

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/264208f81be94cfd4936f8b136ae9b8635aab7d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The morphological family size effect and morphology (2000, background): “Although the work of Taft and Forster is to our knowledge the rst to explicitly accord a role to morphological families, the prediction that follows from a serial search through family bins is that words with large families should on average give rise to longer response latencies than words with sm”
Derivative Word Forms: What Do Learners Know? (2002, background): “…Zwitserlood, 1994); the interactions between learner strategies and input (Kim, McGregor, & Thompson, 2000); the role of phonology (e.g., Stemberger, 1995); the size of the word family (e.g., Bertram et al., 2000); and the frequency of the members within a word family (e.g., Nagy et al., 1989).”
Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency (2010, background): “Bertram, Schreuder, et al.'s (2000) results also predict that if any independent influence of base morpheme is found this should be for productively suffixed words only.”
Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic (2011, unknown): “Turning to more linguistically complex words, a Dutch form like rookte smoked , made up of the productive stem rook and the past tense suffix -te , is responded to more quickly and more accurately than an otherwise matched complex form like krijste shrieked , with the less productive stem ”
Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words (2010, background): “…their lexical properties (e.g., word formation type of the affix, existence of inflectional allomorphs or homonyms for the affix, cf. Baayen, 1994; Bertram et al., 2000c; Bertram, Laine, & Karvinen, 1999; Bertram, Laine, Baayen, Schreuder, & Hyönä, 2000b; Järvikivi, Bertram, & Niemi, 2006; Sereno…”
Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities (2007, unknown): “Our difficulty in finding a root frequency effect is reminiscent of Bertram et al.'s (2000) work on low-frequency words in Dutch: Using factorial designs, they, too, had difficulty demonstrating root frequency effects.”
How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant’s Age (2016, background): “Psycholinguistic research (Schreuder and Baayen, 1997; Bertram et al., 2000) has also pointed to the importance of word family size in word processing.”