The morphological family size effect and morphology

By Nivja H. de Jong, Rob Schreuder, Harald Baayen. 2000

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac0fbaaacb998e40b7d2f2a3794c4c58bae35b36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing (2014, background): “Importantly, the family size effect is observed to be predictive over and above other lexical properties such as word frequency, morpheme frequency, word length, orthographic neighborhood size, bigram frequency (De Jong et al., 2000, Schreuder & Baayen, 1997), and age of acquisition (De Jg, 2002).”
Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition (2005, background): “Another type of study concerns the morphological family size effect (e.g., Schreuder & Baayen, 1997; De Jong, Schreuder, & Baayen, 2000 ), an effect that has been shown to be rooted in the morpho-semantic relationships between”
Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency (2010, background): “Family size showed a strong facilitatory relationship with response times when cumulative morpheme frequency was controlled, whereas when family size was controlled, effects of base morpheme frequency were not observed (see also Bertram et al., 2000; De Jong, Schreuder, & Baayen, 2000).”
Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. (2006, background): “Furthermore, there is evidence that morphology per se is important; the effects associated with morphology cannot be reduced simply to similarities of form and meaning (De Jong et al., 2000; Napps, 1989).”
Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew (2005, background): “De Jong, Schreuder, and Baayen (2000) , again using visual lexical decision, provided further evidence that the effect of family size is not mediated by surface form.”