Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships

By Sinéad Carey, Benn Lawson, Daniel R. Krause. 2011

484 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2569ba2585343911a0d534abfbf160c5d087cb43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Effects of Major Customer Networks on Supplier Profitability (2017, background): “…investigated supplier– customer relationships from the single perspective of either power (Galbraith & Stiles, 1983; Lanier et al., 2010) or embeddedness (Carey et al., 2011; Kim & Henderson, 2015; Villena et al., 2011), while ignoring the potential interaction between two principles of governance.”
Knowledge Spillovers in the Supply Chain: Evidence from the High Tech Sectors (2015, background): “2005), as well as the relational dimension of social capital (Carey et al., 2011), have also been found to positively impact buyer innovation.”
The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital (2017, background): “Similarly, we verified that GSCM generates frequent and repetitive open communication and information sharing, which accumulates structural social capital, corresponding to studies suggesting that strengthened interactions result in various organizational events, team exercises, joint workshops, and”
Financial benefits and risks of dependency in triadic supply chain relationships (2015, background): “Most studies have focused on the relational context in dyadic relationships (Carey et al., 2011; Kim and Wemmerlöv, 2015; Patatoukas, 2012; Villena et al., 2011) and only a few studies have investigated triadic relationships in supply chains (Cool and Henderson, 1998; Galbraith and Stiles, 1983;…”
Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence (2018, methodology): “The legal bond can stipulate formally how disputes and complaints will be resolved, the operational requirements of goods or services provided, and how the performance of the supplier is to be evaluated [25].”
The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation (2014, background): “Adopting a supply network perspective and making these investments can help firms focus on customers and suppliers that provide the most value to their innovation capability, before going the next step in strengthening ties through initiatives such as sharing knowledge and technical advice with them”
The impact of relational governance on performance improvement in export manufacturing firms (2018, background): “This creates a sense of satisfaction, which in turn employee can be directed to generate more ideas, focus on reducing cost, and reduce product time (Carey et al., 2011).”