Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues

By A. Andrew. 2003

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/254f81b0eaca6325906d375e48eac3ff725b16c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review (2007, methodology): “Sheridan (2002) and Parasuraman and Riley (1997) have opined that there is a tendency for operators to be somewhat distrustful of new warnings, alarms or DSSs until such aids have proven themselves.”
Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots (2007, result): “Based on this and other experimental results, Sheridan [86] recommended that supervisory control and”
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction (2011, background): “Trust in HRI is very much related to trust in automation in general, which has been studied with respect to its various performance influences (Chen et al., 2010; Lee & See, 2004; Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2008; Sheridan, 2002).”
Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence (2014, background): “A driving simulator study by Van der Hulst et al. (1996) found lower time-to-collision values for ACC driving as compared to manual driving in various critical highway scenarios (quantitative data not reported; N = 20 per group).”
Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation (2008, background): “But most safety-critical systems – power plants, intensive care units, and so on – include automation (Sheridan, 2002).”
Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration (2010, background): “…models posited by Moray (2003; Moray & Inagaki, 2000) and Senders (1964) do not consider the potential cost of sampling (e.g., extensive eye or head movements or search time) or the value provided by sampled information, which can pose severe limits on the rate of sampling (Sheridan, 1970, 2002).”
Ergonomics Society of the Human Factors and Human Factors: The Journal (2014, positive): “But most safety-critical systems – power plants, intensive care units, and so on – include automation (Sheridan, 2002).”
Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation (2014, background): “It has been long known that automation can both hurt and benefit human performance (e.g., Bainbridge, 1983; Ephrath & Young, 1981; Kessel & Wickens, 1982; Rasmussen & Rouse, 1981; Sheridan, 2002; Wickens & Kes-sel, 1979, 1981; Wickens, Mavor, Parasuraman, & McGee, 1998; Wiener & Curry, 1980).”
Effects of Information Source, Pedigree, and Reliability on Operator Interaction With Decision Support Systems (2007, background): “Sheridan (2002) and Parasuraman and Riley (1997) have opined that there is a tendency for operators to be somewhat distrustful of new warnings, alarms, or DSSs until such aids have proven themselves.”
Modeling and Predicting Mental Workload in En Route Air Traffic Control: Critical Review and Broader Implications (2007, background): “With the rapid advancement of technology, complex work systems have evolved in which operators must adapt their decision making and performance in the face of dynamic, ever-changing environments, concurrent task demands, time pressure, and tactical constraints (Moray, 1997; Sheridan, 2002).”
Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control (2007, background): “More complete reviews of issues in human interaction with automation may be found elsewhere (Degani, 2004; Lee & See, 2004; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997; Parasuraman et al., 2000; Sheridan, 2002; Vicente, 1999).”
Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? (2012, background): “Literature on human factors in automation has widely reported on the disadvantages of inappropriate automation (Bainbridge 1983; Sheridan 2002; Sheridan and Parasuraman 2006).”
Cyber Threats Facing Autonomous and Connected Vehicles: Future Challenges (2017, background): “The different levels of automation range from level 0 where the computer offers no assistance to level 4 where the computer does everything ignoring the human [58].”