Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation

By Raja Parasuraman, C. Wickens. Hum. Factors, 2008

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a5a4544e2faaa90dc2c2c561e5a5717c72f48c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2020, background): “This treatment illustrates the proposed and widely cited LOA continuum approach (Kaber, 2018; Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008).”
Understanding human management of automation errors (2013, methodology): “classification’ (Riley 1996, 23). Not surprisingly, research has demonstrated that using perfectly reliable automation results in superior system performance when compared to manual performance (Moray, Inagaki, and Itoh 2000; Dixon, Wickens, and Chang 2005). Further, using 100% reliable automation r”
Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? (2012, background): “Better understanding of the human based on measurements and modeling (Parasuraman and Wickens 2008; Abbink and Mulder 2010) is expected to lead to less disagreement between automation system and human operator.”
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy (2019, background): “For example, information processing tasks comprise of (1) information acquisition; (2) information analysis; (3) decision and action selection; and (4) action implementation (Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008).”
The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors (2015, background): “Unreliability may lead to underdependence; high reliability may lead to operator complacency (Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008).”
Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration (2010, background): “These findings suggest that complacency is associated with a cognitive orientation toward very-high-reliability automation prior to the first time it has failed in the user’s experience (R. Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008).”
Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction (2014, background): “One rationale is that it may be risky to program a machine to have high autonomy in a task that requires decision support, particularly if the decision outcome involves lethality or other human safety concerns (Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2000; Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008).”
Affective Processes in Human–Automation Interactions (2011, background): “Thus, although trust in an automated system is a more cognitive attitude (Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008) and is strongly associated with judgments of predictability, dependability, responsibility, and competence (Muir, 1994; Muir & Moray, 1996), liking encompasses a more affectively laden impression…”
Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement (2008, background): “Furthermore, it has been elaborated in subsequent treatments by Kaber and Endsley (1997, 2003), Endsley and Kaber (1999), and Parasuraman and colleagues (Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2000; Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008 [this issue]).”