Entrepreneurship as a Utility-Maximizing Response
By E. Douglas, Dean A. Shepherd. 2000
576 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2525346c6d7250cc0249b031cad1ac9011f343f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Roy Thurik
- F. Liñán
- Dirk De Clercq
- Johan Wiklund
- David B. Audretsch
- Holger Patzelt
- Melissa S. Cardon
Citations in the corpus
- The Motivation to Become an Entrepreneur (2005, result): “This is consistent with the economics-based models discussed above (Campbell, 1992; Douglas and Shepherd, 1999, Praag and Cramer, 2001; Levesque et al., 2002), which all included risk as a predictor.”
- Perceptions of Adverse Work Conditions and Innovative Behavior: The Buffering Roles of Relational Resources (2016, background): “More broadly, the appeal of stepping off the beaten path relates to the nature and perceived value of the effort required to do so (Douglas & Shepherd, 2000; Monsen, Patzelt, & Saxton, 2010).”
- One size does not fit all: Entrepreneurial expectancies and growth intentions of US women and men nascent entrepreneurs (2012, background): “Douglas and Shepherd (2000) modelled the choice to pursue entrepreneurship as a utility function, which reflected anticipated income, the amount of work effort anticipated to achieve this income, the risk involved, plus”
- ADHD-like behavior and entrepreneurial intentions (2013, background): “Autonomy reasons are among the most cited factors for preferring entrepreneurship over wage-employment (Kolvereid, 1996; Douglas and Shepherd, 2002), even though a self-employed person still answers to stakeholders (e.g., customers, suppliers, investors) (Katz, 1994). According to Hartmann (2002), t”
- Perceived progress variability and entrepreneurial effort intensity: The moderating role of venture goal commitment (2015, background): “, 1997), gender differences in entrepreneurial career motivation (DeMartino and Barbato, 2003), and a person’s utility function reflected in anticipated income, risk attitudes, desire for independence, and the like (Douglas and Shepherd, 2000).”
- Aspiring for, and Achieving Growth: The Moderating Role of Resources and Opportunities (2003, background): “The fulfilment of non-economic personal goals, such as gaining independence or developing own ideas, are stated as primary reasons for operating one’s own firm (Douglas and Shepherd, 2000).”
- Parental role models and the decision to become self-employed: The moderating effect of personality (2012, result): “This variable has the advantages that it is consistent with many existing studies and models of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial behavior (Douglas and Shepherd 2000, 2002; De Witt and Van Winden 1989; White et al. 2007), and with macrolevel studies investigating the impact of self-employment on…”
- Considering business start-up in recession time: The role of risk perception and economic context in shaping the entrepreneurial intent (2013, background): “Similarly, a positive attitude to “independence” implies a preference for decision-making control and choosing one’s own path to achieve personal objectives (Douglas & Shepherd 2000), and therefore may clearly be affected by risk perceptions.”
- Inventors and New Venture Formation: the Effects of General Self–Efficacy and Regretful Thinking (2002, background): “Others hypothesized that individuals choose between entrepreneurial or employment careers (or a combination of the two) based on expected utility, such as income, risk, work, and independence (Douglas & Shepherd, 2000).”
- Negative emotions of an entrepreneurial career: Self-employment and regulatory coping behaviors (2011, background): “Tasks and responsibilities that are specific for self-employed individuals include the screening for, and recognition of, new business opportunities, business planning, acquisition of financial and non-financial resources, managing and leading employees, creative problem solving, and quick decision ”
- The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations on Academics’ Entrepreneurial Intention (2016, background): “For example Douglas and Shepherd (2002) argue that perceived desirability may be measured in respect to the individual attitude toward risk, work effort and other intrinsic rewards.”