Partners in giving:: The crowding-in effects of UK government grants

By Jyoti Khanna, Todd Sandler. 2000

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2475346183caffed70fc8bdf6dff398d9cbfd229

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Peter Nunnenkamp
2. A. Wit
3. Catherine C. Eckel
4. Garth Heutel
5. René Bekkers
6. Philip J. Grossman

In Gender Studies

1. René Bekkers
2. A. Wit
3. Catherine C. Eckel
4. Pamala Wiepking
5. Garth Heutel
6. Philip J. Grossman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. René Bekkers
2. Pamala Wiepking
3. Lucy Woodliffe
4. Catherine C. Eckel
5. Philip J. Grossman
6. A. Wit
7. Heidi Crumpler
8. Peter Nunnenkamp

Citations in the corpus

• An Experimental Test of the Crowding Out Hypothesis (2005, background): “Khanna and Sandler (2000) likewise find some evidence of crowding in for government grants in the health and social welfare sectors.”
• A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “A later study, found no effect of organizational age (Khanna & Sandler, 2000).”
• Crowding Out and Crowding In of Private Donations and Government Grants (2014, background): “Khanna and Sandler (2000), Andreoni and Payne (2003), and Payne (1998) use similar instruments.”
• Gift giving: An interdisciplinary review (2007, background): “J edge that whether public policy contributions crowd out or, indeed, crowd in (see, e.g., Khanna and Sandler, 2000) private contributions, and the extent of this effect depends largely on which model of moral-based motivation (altruism, norm, fairness, commitment, and cognitive evaluation) is…”
• An experimental test of warm glow giving (2008, background): “Furthermore, Ribar and Wilhelm’s model does not explain the crowding in observed by Khanna, Posnett, and Sandler, 1995; Khanna and Sandler, 2000; and Payne, 2001 or deny the fiscal illusion explanation for the low levels of crowding out observed in the empirical studies.”
• Government Support and Charitable Donations: A Meta-Analysis of the Crowding-out Hypothesis (2016, methodology): “…(e.g. Andreoni and Payne 2011; Garrett and Rhine 2010; Gronberg et al. 2012; Isaac and Norton 2013) there are plenty studies that show a positive association between government support and private donations (e.g. Brooks 2003b; Khanna and Sandler 2000; Okten and Weisbrod 2000; Sokolowski 2013).”
• Volunteer Labour Supply: The Role of Workers Motivations (2004, unknown): “Recent works (e.g. Okten and Weisbrod, 2000, and Khanna and Sandler, 2000) concentrates on the effects of fundraising expenditures and government grants on money giving.”
• Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs: An Empirical Analysis of Non-charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign Aid (2012, background): “8 Earlier studies on whether official funding crowds out (or rather crowds in) private donations to NGOs with domestic activities in the United States and the United Kingdom include Payne (1998), Okten and Weisbrod (2000), and Khanna and Sandler (2000). 9 They find empirical support for arts and soc”