An Experimental Test of the Crowding Out Hypothesis

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dictator games: a meta study (2011, background): “If the recipient also receives an endowment upfront (as, for instance, in Eckel et al. 2005 ), this strongly reduces giving: meta-regression cons .291 ∗∗∗ , recipient endowment −.213 ∗∗∗ , N = 445, adj.R 2 .052.”
Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism (2014, unknown): “To assure participants that the experimental procedures were followed we used a verification procedure similar to that in Eckel et al. (2005).”
Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving (2010, background): “In addition, the dependence of preferences on context-dependent norms can account for framing effects, e.g., Eckel, Grossman and Johnston (2005) find dictator transfers depend on whether differences in endowments are characterized as taxes.”
Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part two: gender, marital status, income, and wealth (2012, methodology): “…and Latané (1981) LG Andreoni et al (2003) LG Keyt et al (2002) LG Midlarsky and Hannah (1989) LG Weyant (1984) € Andreoni et al (2003) € Chang (2005b) € Eckel et al (2005) Human services LG Carman (2006) LG Marx (2000) LG Regnerus et al (1998) € Andreoni et al (2003) € Chang (2005b) € Eckel et…”