An experimental test of warm glow giving

By Heidi Crumpler, Philip J. Grossman. 2008

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34b2bbd5e722b1059060c724193a8a1d8a445eba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Emerging Study of Positive Empathy (2015, background): “For example, individuals motivated by warm glow donate to charitable organizations even if their donations crowd out third party donations and thus provide no additional benefit to others (Crumpler & Grossman, 2008).”
Warm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving (2011, background): “In perhaps the most direct possible test, Crumpler and Grossman (2008) designed an experiment in which subjects' contributions to charities perfectly crowded out contributions made by the experimenters.”
Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving (2017, unknown): “2 Many experiments have demonstrated that preferences depend on more than the outcomes of consumption, beginning with Andreoni (1993), up to most recently Crumpler and Grossman (2008) and Gronberg et al. (2012). periment.”
Adjusting the Warm-Glow Thermostat: How Incentivizing Participation in Voluntary Green Programs Moderates Their Impact on Service Satisfaction (2016, background): “Experimental economists typically demonstrate warm glow using game theory outcomes (e.g., Crumpler and Grossman 2008; Tonin and Vlassopoulos 2013).”
Application of waqf for social and development finance (2017, background): “Other motives identified in the literature include moral satisfaction generated by contributing (Crumpler and Grossman, 2008), peer pressure which triggers reluctant altruism (DellaVigna et al.”
Fair Air: Distributive Justice and Environmental Economics (2010, background): “Crumpler and Grossman (2008) present subjects with a choice of charities, and dictators seem to choose most frequently ones serving those whose basic needs or health is threatened. The results of Konow (2010) provide stronger support for a concern for basic needs: in one treatment, dictators donate ”
Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving (2010, unknown): “, Dana et al. (2007), Bolton et al.”
The effect of effectiveness: Donor response to aid effectiveness in a direct mail fundraising experiment (2017, background): “In another direct test of warm-glow preferences, Crumpler and Grossman (2008) observes that most subjects gave to a charity even though their donation crowded-out one-for-one a donation by the experimenters.”