Social translucence

By Thomas Erickson, Wendy A. Kellogg. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 2000

1,214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2469fd136aaf16c49bbe6814d6153da1dc6c7c23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities (2007, background): “This information helps individuals better comprehend their own identities as seen by others (Erickson et al. 2002, Erickson and Kellogg 2000, Gerhard et al. 2002, Lerner and Tetlock 1999), which in turn may attenuate the attribution difference between members and lead to a high perceived identity…”
Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository (2012, neutral): “social translucence as described by [8].”
Predicting human interruptibility with sensors (2005, background): “Hudson et al. propose that researchers focus on making interruptions more effective and suggests socially translucent systems [Erickson and Kellogg 2000] as an approach.”
Writeprints: A stylometric approach to identity-level identification and similarity detection in cyberspace (2008, background): “Tools providing greater informational transparency in cyberspace are necessary to counter anonymity abuses and garner increased accountability [Erickson and Kellogg 2000; Sack 2000].”
Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks (2013, background): “The mismatch also reflects the state of social media as a socially translucent rather than socially transparent system [15, 16].”
Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace (2007, background): “The use of technology to carry out communication leads to persistence (Erickson and Kellogg, 2000).”
23 Ways to Nudge: A Review of Technology-Mediated Nudging in Human-Computer Interaction (2019, background): “This form of social translucence [27] is assumed to nudge the child towards the desirable behavior through increasing mutual awareness (i.e., the child knows that her parent will know).”
Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL (2006, neutral): “The iterative design tradition is exemplified by Barab & Squire (2004), Fischer & Ostwald (2005), Guzdial et al. (1997), and Lingnau, et al. (2003).”
How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work (2009, background): “Tool designs guided by theory were helpful for increasing social presences among coworkers [8,25], however, few empirical studies have yet shown significant impacts of increased social cues in CMC systems on leading to promote impromptu conversations and informal exchanges [24].”
Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility (2014, positive): “Technologies that make workflows (Kinnaird, Dabbish, & Kiesler, 2012), activity statuses (Dourish & Bellotti, 1992), social presence (Erickson & Kellogg, 2000), and even one’s location (Erickson, 2010) visible to others provide a means for individuals to learn about the work their colleagues…”
Ambient Awareness and Knowledge Acquisition: Using Social Media to Learn "Who Knows What" and "Who Knows Whom" (2015, background): “Most enterprise sites, like their public counterparts, provide lists of “contacts” or “connections” that individuals have approved.”