Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace

By Catherine Dwyer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Katia Passerini. Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2007

1,454 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21cd1fdf059444a58eddba89cc044bc7cf9b5928

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship (2007, unknown): “In analyzing trust on social network sites, Dwyer, Hiltz, and Passerini (2007) argued that trust and usage goals may affect what people are willing to share—Facebook users expressed greater trust in Facebook than MySpace users did in MySpace and thus were more willing to share information on the…”
An Alternative View of Privacy on Facebook (2011, background): “The typical standard study of privacy on Facebook and other social networking sites focuses on the analysis of information disclosures by users (in many cases younger users) (for example: Acquisti and Gross 2006 [37]; Barnes 2006 [38]; Dwyer 2007 [39]; Dwyer, Hiltz and Passerini 2007 [40]; Fogel and”
4chan and /b/: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community (2011, background): “For example, while Facebook embraces real names (Facebook 2010), Myspace does not (Dwyer, Hiltz, and Passerini 2007), and some Usenet boards allow posting from anonymous e-mail addresses (Donath 1999).”
Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites (2009, background): “Recent topics include identity management and signaling [15,36], social capital [17], trust and privacy [16], and social use differences between demographics [7,28,33,35].”
Loose tweets: an analysis of privacy leaks on twitter (2011, unknown): “Examples of topical keywords include“holiday”, “fly to”, and“travel” for vacation tweets, “I am drunk”for drunk tweets, and“cancer”, “depression” and “diabetes” for disease tweets.”
The effect of social network sites on adolescents' social and academic development: Current theories and controversies (2011, background): “Similarly, Eccles and Templeton (2002) also suggest that peer groups transmit a social identity that affects student behaviors.”
Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Images (2017, unknown): “Privacy is becoming an increasing concern [48, 10], especially due to the rise of social networking websites allowing individuals to share personal information, without explaining consequences of these actions.”
Gender Differences in Privacy-Related Measures for Young Adult Facebook Users (2010, unknown): “Some of these studies have been based on self-reported information disclosures using surveys (e.g., Dwyer, Hiltz, and Passerini 2007; Stutzman 2006; Tufekci 2008), all of which report a high level of personal information disclosure on SNS profiles.”
Motivations for social networking at work (2008, background): “The research thus far on social network sites (SNSs) has been focused on four main aspects: privacy issues [1, 9, 14, 16, 21], self presentation [6, 7, 13, 24], network analysis [3, 18], and social capital benefits [10, 20].”
Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town (2009, background): “Dwyer et al. (2007) found that in online interaction, trust is not as necessary in the building of new relationships as it is in face-to-face encounters; and that in general, Facebook members tend to reveal a lot of information about themselves, without being aware of privacy options or knowing…”
Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook (2013, unknown): “15”