Building open government

By P. McDermott. Government Information Quarterly, 2010

465 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2463f55949b8a71b5241879130f7ba656a4658db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA) (2017, background): “…citizens with convenient access to such information and services (Schaupp & Carter, 2010), the ability to search and acquire them at their own convenience without the restriction of geography (Schaupp et al., 2010; West, 2008), and the ability to participate in open government (McDermott, 2010).”
When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program (2011, background): “Nonetheless, a consortium of volunteers conducted its own evaluation and discovered that the initial dataset submissions were a “mixed bag,” meaning that they contained both high-value and non-high-value datasets (McDermott, 2010, p. 402).”
An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement (2012, background): “The advent of social media has opened up unprecedented new possibilities of engaging the public in government work and has changed the public's expectations about how government work should be done (Chun, Shulman, Sandoval, & Hovy, 2010; Lathrop & Ruma, 2010; McDermott, 2010).”
Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison (2014, background): “…gains from the use of open government data (European_Commission, 2011b), whereas the Obama Administration focuses on increasing transparency, participation and collaboration, which it assumes will improve the quality of services to the American people (McDermott, 2010; The_White_House, 2012).”
Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government (2012, background): “It has also made collaboration a key part of its transparency strategy (McDermott, 2010).”
Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 (2012, background): “The Open Government Directive promises to equip agencies with the relevant tools and support necessary to leverage the knowledge of crowds (McDermott, 2010: 401; Wilson & Linders, 2011: 389).”
Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government (2012, background): “research in this area consists of conceptual papers (Bertot, Jaeger, & Grimes, 2010; McDermott, 2010), descriptions of”
Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization (2015, background): “…the legal and regulatory basis for President Obama’s Open Government Directive to "establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration" (McDermott, 2010); and the use of digital technology by parliaments and their members to support accountability and greater engagement…”
Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (2015, background): “, 2011), innovation (Janssen, 2011; van Veenstra & van den Broek, 2013), and increased participation of citizens in government activities (Conradie & Choenni, 2014;McDermott, 2010).”