Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization

By Tomasz Janowski. Government Information Quarterly, 2015

758 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Media Technology, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abf0090d16ba47b4402a6693b0c9fa1febd5a3ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Media Technology

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Conceptualizing Digital Transformation in Business Organizations: A Systematic Review of Literature (2017, background): “(2013); Janowski (2015); Loebbecke & Picot (2015); Luna-Reyes & Gil-Garcia (2014); Matt, et.al.”
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review (2018, neutral): “The Digital Government Evolution Model proposed by Janowski (2015) corroborates this idea in which the evolution is related to the transformation level that goes from no governmental transformation, to internal government transformation, transformation that also affects the relationships between…”
Developing a unified definition of digital transformation (2021, background): “For instance, while some authors view DT as a slight technology-enabled change such as implementing a new ERP System (S. Chanias, 2017), others believe that DT is a more radical and evolutionary process that takes place over time (Janowski, 2015; Loebbecke and Picot, 2015; Wang et al., 2018).”
Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives (2017, background): “Considering the context of a developing country, it has been noted that there are specific situations that address the needs of vulnerable groups, as suggested by Janowski (2015) in the stage of contextualization of electronic governance.”
Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government (2016, background): “Adapting to changes is becoming the more important as some argue that the government is fundamentally changing (Janowski, 2015; Linders, 2012) and businesses expect and legislation is running behind the possibilities enabled by technology.”