A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines

By R. Harbour, Julie M. Miller. British medical journal, 2001

1,626 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/242c8d5ea46687e0bfdb157e38812feb49f7bde1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Standardized Postnatal Management of Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Europe: The CDH EURO Consortium Consensus - 2015 Update (2010, methodology): “published a manuscript, together with some experts of the CDH EURO Consortium, on the perinatal management of isolated CDH. However, there are no extensive standardized protocols for the postnatal management of CDH. As a consequence, members of the CDH EURO Consortium, a collaboration of specialized”
Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report. (2007, background): “Users may misinterpret the grade of recommendation or they may fail to properly weigh lower-grade recommendations [20].”
Interstitial lung disease guideline (2008, background): “Also, in the course of guideline development, there has been a discussion in the literature on the usefulness of guideline recommendations for everyday practice.(11) Treatment decisions involve a trade-off between the potential benefits and risks, and these decisions need to be individualised on a c”
Work Stress and Employee Health (2013, methodology): “…between work stress and CVD indicators (myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, high blood pressure) reported a measure of methodological quality based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (Harbour & Miller, 2001), and related this quality measure to study findings.”
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group (2004, methodology): “Since then a number of alternative approaches has been proposed and used to classify clinical practice guidelines [2-28].”
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations (2006, background): “5 (102) 48 (69) 90 (131) Yes (stakeholder involved) 19 (27) 54 (79) 31 (45)”
Psychological Considerations in the Assessment and Treatment of Pain in Neurorehabilitation and Psychological Factors Predictive of Therapeutic Response: Evidence and Recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (2016, methodology): “Legend: for B, C, and GPP please check the previous Table 2 —Grades of recommendations (Harbour and Miller, 2001). sense, as opposed to simply intervening at a symptom-level.”
Current issues and future directions in Psychology and Health : Towards a cumulative science of behaviour change: Do current conduct and reporting of behavioural interventions fall short of best practice? (2007, background): “Reviews based on RCTs are considered the strongest evidence-informing interventions (Harbour & Miller, 2001).”
International Consensus on drug allergy (2014, methodology): “Recommendations were extrapolated from the reference documents and presented using levels of Evidence A–D (28) (Table 1).”