Editors' Introduction

By A. Salisbury, J. Manley. Journal of Systems and Software, 2010

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We want to ask, rather, what is the operative notion of the common today, in the midst of postmodernity, the information revolution, and the consequent transformations of the mode of production. It seems to us, in fact, that today we participate in a more radical and profound commonality than has ever been experienced in the history of capitalism. The fact is that we participate in a productive world made up of communication and social networks, interactive services, and common languages. Our economic and social reality is defined less by the material objects that are made and consumed than by co-produced services and relationships. Producing increasingly means constructing cooperation and communicative commonalities. */Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2426403a05e07658294d9dd01ffe21a8ae641a14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control (2001, background): “Accountability is more managerial than political (Nagel 1997).”
Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter? (2010, background): “Many empirical studies have so far measured the level of PSM in various public organizations (Perry and Hondeghem 2008c) and have then tested the antecedents of PSM (e.g., socio-demographic factors), its outcomes (e.g., individual performance), or its correlates (e.g., organizational commitment).”
Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries (2001, background): “Organizations are responding to these changes by reducing their hierarchy and attempting to minimize internal boundaries as the new competitive focus moves from value appropriation to value creation (Carroll and Flood, 2000).”
The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta‐Analysis (2010, background): “This perspective is well-known, in part, because Akers has summarized the details of the model on a variety of occasions (see, e.g., Akers, 1998, 2001; Akers, Krohn, Lanza-Kaduce, & Radosevich, 1979; Akers & Sellers, 2009; see also, Akers & Jensen, 2003b).”