Payments for environmental services: From theory to practice
By S. Pagiola, G. Platais. 2006
271 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23c4334129dd17d980a7104c28aea1e25f6298da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Katharine R. E. Sims
- Jennifer Alix-García
- Stephen Polasky
- R. Muradian
- E. Nelson
- U. Narloch
- U. Pascual
- Kris A. Johnson
Citations in the corpus
- In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “…(Sandel, 2012), it did not apparently shake the interest on MBIs, since they have kept gaining traction among economists, policy makers, and natural scientists over recent years (Pagiola and Platais, 2007; Engel et al., 2008; Miles and Kapos, 2008; Lockie, 2012; Lapeyre et al., in press).”
- Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program (2012, background): “…for ecosystem services (PES) programs are an important form of incentivebased conservation worldwide (Landell-Mills and Porras 2002; Wunder 2007; Pagiola and Platais 2007; Gutman and Davidson 2007; Pfaff et al. 2007; Engel, Pagiola, and Wunder 2008; Jack, Kousky, and Sims 2008).”
- Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico (2011, background): “It is therefore a mechanism to internalise what otherwise would be a market externality (Pagiola and Platais, 2007).”
- The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota (2011, background): “Further work evaluating both the theory and practice of payments for ecosystem services (e.g., Pagiola and Platais 2007; Jack et al. 2008), responses to policy interventions and the resulting spatial pattern of land use (e.g., Andam et al. 2008; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al. 2007), and analysis of the…”
- Payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services for sustained on-farm utilization of plant and animal genetic resources (2011, background): “Of course, the problem of such strategy is that it could eventually create perverse incentives if the program is not carefully designed (as per Pagiola and Platais, 2007).”
- When payments for environmental services will work for conservation (2013, background): “…that originally developed the concept, propagated its dissemination, and engaged early in realworld PES implementation and learning processes (e.g. Ferraro 2001; Wunder 2005; Pagiola & Platais 2007), with case analyses published in another special issue (Engel et al. 2008; Wunder et al. 2008).”