Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico

By Luis Rico García-Amado, M. Pérez, Felipe Reyes Escutia, Sara Barrasa García, E. Mejía. 2011

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e8f88ffa7129db26b384c89f29551ae70e41a62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence (2015, unknown): “García-Amado et al. (2013)”
Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “In a large number of cases, PES have contributed to reinforcing collective and individual conservation behavior as schemes have been characterized by low levels of environmental additionality and financial compensation [36,37,58 ].”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “For instance, SLCP payments were higher than the opportunity costs of retired land (Liang et al., 2012), while the payments of the PSAH in Mexico were lower than alternative incomes (Alix-Garcia et al., 2014; García-Amado et al., 2011; Scullion et al., 2011).”
What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program (2014, background): “A number of researchers have pointed to the importance of “intangibles” or non-monetary factors in motivating PES participation (Kosoy et al., 2007, 2008; Garcia-Amado et al., 2011; Van Hecken et al., 2012).”
Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services (2012, background): “This might be the case, for instance, of Mexican indigenous groups receiving payments for the conservation of forests and other ecosystems that are not really threatened within their territories (Rico et al., 2011; Ibarra et al., 2011).”