Reconsidering Reliability in Classroom Assessment and Grading

By Jeffrey K. Smith. 2005

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/238e63e78e1233572dfb721a9f9a2c84432d2b19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Brookhart

In Education

1. S. Brookhart
2. Heidi L. Andrade
3. Frank Giraldo
4. Wayne A. Zientarski
5. J. Walsh

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. S. Brookhart

Citations in the corpus

• Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers (2011, background): “Several authors have conceptualized more specifically what teachers need to know about validity and reliability for classroom assessment (Moss, 2003; Nitko & Brookhart, 2011, p. 37–42, 66–68; Smith, 2003; Taylor & Nolen, 2005, p. 17–24; Whittington, 1999), in addition to the more conventional validi”
• A Century of Grading Research (2016, unknown): “Smith, J. K. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 26–33. doi:10.1111/j.17453992.2003.tb00141.x Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2009). The impact of framing effect on student preferences for university grading system”