Innovation: Location Matters
By Michael E. Porter, Scott Stern. 2001
725 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/235a96dab58403fadd013e50b13346b9e748625d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David B. Audretsch
- Joakim Wincent
- Erik E. Lehmann
- Michel Ferrary
- Vinit Parida
- Panagiotis Piperopoulos
- Martin Kenney
- Jie Wu
Citations in the corpus
- Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms (2004, background): “Porter and Stern (2001) identify four attributes of a location’s micro-economic IMPEDIMENTS TO INNOVATION 223 environment that affect innovation: the presence of high-quality and specialized inputs; a context that encourages investment together with intense local rivalry; pressure and insight…”
- Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation (2007, background): “The findings of this study support the notion that firms can proactively combine and re-combine knowledge into significantly enhanced products and production processes by recognizing the incentives to disperse research capabilities to the most attractive locations (Zander, 1997; Porter and Stern, 20”
- INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN LAGGING REGIONS (2013, unknown): “Forming close institutional relationships, including labor market, knowledge, and supply-chain links, may aid in the formation of clusters that could further increase growth (Porter, 1998; Porter and Stern, 2001; Porter, 2003).”
- Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan (2007, background): “Porter and Stern (2001) said that Taiwan has made substantial investments in upgrading its innovative MRN 30,2 116 capacities over the past decade and achieved large increases in patenting rates.”
- The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms (2010, background): “A number of studies have identified localized supply chain benefits in high-tech industries (Porter and Stern 2001).”
- The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley's complex innovation network (2009, background): “Several studies have pointed out that innovation-based competitiveness does not result from a single economic agent but from a complex process in which several geographically localized agents interact (Powell, Koput & Smith-Doerr, 1996; OECD, 1999, 2001; Porter & Stern, 2001).”
- The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks (2009, background): “While technology transfer and product adaptation were always necessary conditions for the worldwide ‘exploitation’ of the core ‘ownership advantages’ of the modern multinational, the increasing dispersion of R&D and the more open approaches have mainly been explained as ‘strategic asset-seeking’ act”
- Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰ (2021, background): “vival and competitive advantage – innovation (Lengnick-Hall, 1992; Porter and Stern, 2001).”
- Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises (2018, background): “Nevertheless, although the innovative capacity of each country differs (Porter and Stern, 2001), internationalization in multiple countries provides EMEs with exposure to diverse and broad organizational learning opportunities and sources, which increases EMEs’ knowledge base and R&D capabilities…”
- Editorial Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda (2006, background): “External sources of knowledge and innovation have become increasingly relevant (Porter and Stern, 2001).”
- University Spillovers: Does the Kind of Science Matter? (2004, background): “…is important for new and highly innovative firms and since tacit knowledge could not be easily transferred over large distances or bought via the market, it has become a major determinant in the competitiveness of regions and locations for those firms (Porter and Stern 2001; Florida 2002).”
- Competitive Advantage Revisited: Michael Porter on Strategy and Competitiveness (2007, background): “…competitiveness, industrial economics, innovation, the economic development of nations, regions, and cities, corporate philanthropy, and environmental issues (Porter, 1991a, 1991b, 1991c, 1995, 1996a, 1996b, 2001a, 2001b, 2003a, 2003b; Porter & Kramer 1999; Porter & van der Linde, 1995a, 1995b).”