Cues to deception.

By B. DePaulo, James J. Lindsay, Brian E Malone, Laura Muhlenbruck, K. Charlton, Harris Cooper. Psychological bulletin, 2003

2,540 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/234a741a8bcdf25f5924101edc1f67f164f5277b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Interviewing to detect deception (2014, background): “Cognition is also considered to be one of the main deception factors in Buller and Burgoon’s (1996) Interpersonal Deception Theory, DePaulo’s Self-Presentational Perspective (DePaulo, 1992; DePaulo et al., 2003) and in Ekman’s (1985/2009) work.”
Honest and deceptive impression management in the employment interview: : Can it be detected and how does it impact evaluations? (2015, background): “Indeed, cues to deception are often hardly discernible (DePaulo et al., 2003), and people (even experts) often tend to interpret the wrong nonverbal behaviors as cues of deception, such as nervousness or facial cues (Vrij et al., 2010).”
Facial Expression Analysis (2011, background): “Without training, few people can perform these actions deliberately, which incidentally is an aid to lie detection [36].”
PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships (2011, background): “Social interaction processes including diverse behaviours and perceptions have been investigated in a wide range of research fields such as communication research (Hall, Coats, & LeBeau, 2005), research on nonverbal behaviour and deception (DePaulo et al., 2003), parent–child relationships (Branje e”
The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, background): “Further, liars are more likely than truth-tellers to repeat words, phrases, and details (DePaulo et al., 2003; Porter, Yuille, & Lehman, 1999; Sporer & Schwandt, 2006).”
Credibility of the emotional witness: A study of ratings by police investigators (2008, background): “Surveys of beliefs about signs of deception indicate that police officers (incorrectly) list the same signs as lay people (DePaulo et al., 2003; Ekman, O’Sullivan, & Frank, 1999; Ekman & O’Sullivan, 1991; Vrij & Mann, 2001), and police officers do not outperform lay people when required to…”
The Creativity of Lying: Divergent Thinking and Ideational Correlates of the Resolution of Social Dilemmas (2008, background): “telling effective lies minimizes the likelihood of their detection and, in so doing, also preserves the trust of a liar–target relationship (DePaulo et al., 2003).”
Sensitive questions in surveys. (2007, background): “Lying is common in everyday life and it seems only slightly more burdensome cognitively than telling the truth—people report that they do not spend much time planning lies and that they regard their everyday lies as of little consequence (DePaulo et al., 1996, 2003).”
Linguistic Cues to Deception and Perceived Deception in Interview Dialogues (2018, background): “In contrast to (DePaulo et al., 2003), we found”
When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence (2013, methodology): “To manipulate confidence (or self-perceived task ability), we trained the two actors to exhibit high or average levels of confidence in ways outlined by prior research (Anderson et al., 2012; Berger, Webster, Ridgeway, & Rosenholtz, 1986, p. 160; Brinol & Petty, 2003; DePaulo et al., 2003; Ridgeway,”
Lie detection and the polygraph: A historical review (2005, background): “…have been associated with deception, including gaze aversion, increased or decreased movement, longer and more frequent pauses, a slower speech rate, hesitations, and speech errors (DePaulo et al., 2003; Ekman, 1992), but the evidence for consistent, generalisable indicators of deception is weak.”
To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation (2006, background): “The findings are mostly discouraging; only a few behaviours have been consistently found to be somewhat indicative of deception, and no cue to deception always works (DePaulo et al, 2003 ; Vrij, 2000a ).”
‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? (2010, background): “Fourth, liars may be preoccupied by the task of reminding themselves to act and role play (DePaulo et al., 2003), which requires extra cognitive effort.”
The value of distrust (2008, background): “It may reflect residual activation of previous episodes of focused distrust, or the impact of cues that are typically associated with deception (e.g., the amount of details in the message, vocal tension, or fidgeting; see DePaulo et al., 2003 for a meta-analytic review).”