Depersonalized trust and ingroup cooperation.

By M. Brewer. 2008

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/228247cfc4d0b30a9d751c1b1a1c1dc3c5079ddc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “Similarly, knowledge about another’s social category can trigger social stereotypes which, in turn, may be associated with specific trustworthiness expectations (Brewer, 2008).”
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2014, background): “BGR predicts that there should be relatively stronger amounts of intergroup discrimination under mutual outcome interdependence, because people have a generalized expectation that their ingroup members will cooperate (Brewer, 2008; Yamagishi et al., 1999; see also Balliet & Van Lange, 2013).”
Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions (2018, background): “Higher initial trust can also result from cognitive cues arising from group membership, reputations, and stereotypes from the social categorization process (Brewer, 2008; Lewis & Weigert, 1985).”
The Psychology (and Economics) of Trust (2009, background): “In these situations, you are engaging in depersonalized trust – trusting someone because of a shared social identity (Brewer, 1986, 2008).”
Repairing and Enhancing Trust: Approaches to Reducing Organizational Trust Deficits (2010, background): “Complementing these individual, psychological factors, researchers have also identified a variety of social (Brewer, 2008; Fine & Holyfield, 1996) and organizational factors (Bohnet & Huck, 2004; Farrell, 2009; Zucker, 1986) influencing trust-related expectations.”