Current Trends in Research Methodology and Statistics in Applied Linguistics
By Anne Lazaraton. 2000
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22729eb2d920445965e258a806530d35c43b3e07
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Luke Plonsky
- F. Oswald
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Ian Cunnings
- Jared Linck
- S. Gass
- Katrin Niglas
- Anne Lazaraton
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Luke Plonsky
- Jared Linck
- Ian Cunnings
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- F. Oswald
- Katrin Niglas
- S. Gass
- Anne Lazaraton
Citations in the corpus
- Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges (2010, background): “More commonly, SLA research involves experimental and quasiexperimental designs that measure the effect of a treatment on an outcome (Lazaraton, 2000; Teleni & Baldauf, 1989).”
- Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research (2011, background): “Several reports have described second-language (L2) research methods and reporting practices generally, but without the explicit intention to assess their quality (e.g., Edge & Richards, 1998; Henning, 1986; Lazaraton, 2000).”
- THE COMBINED USE OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ABSTRACT (2004, result): “…as the journals where only one approach was prevalent were not included into the sample, these results are in concordance with those gained by Lazaraton (2000) in the field of language learning and by Rocco et al. (2003) who reviewed studies from four specific fields of educational research…”
- Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: Whose Criteria and Whose Research? (2003, background): “guage Acquisition, and TESOL Quarterly from 19911997 (Lazaraton, 2000).”
- STUDY QUALITY IN SLA (2013, background): “For example, he lamented measures of low reliability, generally poor design, and the fact that “intact groups [as opposed to random assignment to experimental conditions] are the norm” (pp. 66–67; see also Henning, 1986 ; Lazaraton, 2000 , 2005 ; Nunan, 1991 , 1996 ).”
- Investigating the Psychological and Emotional Dimensions in Instructed Language Learning: Obstacles and Possibilities (2005, methodology): “…(myself included) are often autodidacts in statistics, a great deal of the research lacks methodological rigor, is based on small samples (cf. Lazaraton, 2000; Norris & Ortega, 2000) or relies on extremely 371 simple designs, where one single independent variable is correlated with one…”
- The Utility and Application of Mixed-Effects Models in Second Language Research (2015, methodology): “Despite the varied nature of SLA research, surveys of statistical analysis techniques used in L2 acquisition have noted a near ubiquitous use of ANOVA and t-test (Lazaraton, 2000; Norris & Ortega, 2000; Plonsky, 2011; Plonsky & Gass, 2011).”