Reliability and Validity Analyses of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory

By F. Schmidt, R. Hoge, L. Gomes. 2005

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2249ed1cd6342cb40ad4890dbca24bacef84ee6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Relationship Between Matching Service to Criminogenic Need and Recidivism in Male and Female Youth (2012, background): “The YLS/CMI is reported to possess moderate to strong internal consistency for all subscales except for Substance Use, the estimate for which falls slightly below .60 (Schmidt et al., 2005).”
Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs (2009, background): “The predictive validity of the YLS/CMI has also been reported as moderate to strong, with significant correlations between total scores on the measure and number of subsequent offenses and time elapsed prior to a new offense in both male and female young offenders (Costigan, 1999; Jung & Rawana, 199”
Risk Assessment With Young Offenders (2009, methodology): “Two additional studies (Schmidt et al., 2005; Schmidt, McKinnon, Chattha, & Brownlee, 2006) also reported predictive accuracy for “serious recidivism” (i.e., violent offenses as well as other serious indictable offenses), and this outcome was coded as violence in the current study.”
Predicting Recidivism in Probationers With the Youth Level of Service Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) (2008, methodology): “This significant correlation between YLS/CMI score and offending has been found in several other more recent studies as well (Flores et al., 2003; Schmidt et al., 2005).”
Sacrificing Accuracy for Transparency in Recidivism Risk Assessment: The Impact of Classification Method on Predictive Performance (2016, background): “Given that prior research has expressed concern for how reliably risk factors can be measured across various domains (Levenson, 2004; Schmidt, Hoge, & Gomes, 2005; Snook, Luther, House, Bennell, & Taylor, 2012) and how e ﬀ ectively the process of risk development and reduction can be speci ﬁ ed…”
Comparative Analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in Adolescent Offenders: A 10-year Follow-Up Into Adulthood (2011, background): “The YLS/CMI has demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003), test retest reliability (Schmidt, Hoge, & Gomes, 2005), and concurrent validity with other behavioral measures of functioning (Jung & Rawana, 1999; Schmidt et al., 2005).”
Assessing Recidivism Risk Across Female Pathways to Crime (2006, background): “Schmidt, Hoge, and Gomes (2005) report the following bivariate correlations between scores derived from the youth version of the LSI-R (i.e., the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory) and recidivism for their sample of 38 “disturbed” and “serious” female juvenile Canadian offenders: r =…”