Predicting Recidivism in Probationers With the Youth Level of Service Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI)
By Eyitayo Onifade, W. Davidson, C. Campbell, Garrett Turke, J. Malinowski, K. Turner. 2008
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/766268e87f8832e5a7d48f875dd4a809125c94f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- J. Wormith
- S. Wormith
- J. Bonta
- Demetra Andrews
- M. Campbell
- Carolyn M. Houlding
- F. Schmidt
- T. Skilling
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Wormith
- J. Bonta
- S. Wormith
- Demetra Andrews
- M. Campbell
- Carolyn M. Houlding
- F. Schmidt
- M. Peterson-badali
Citations in the corpus
- Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, methodology): “Olver and associates found superior validity with the YLS/CMI, the Psychopathy Checklist–Youth Version, and the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth when tested on Canadian young offenders compared to samples of non-Canadian young offenders.”
- The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, methodology): “Similarly, the Youth Level of Service Inventory (YLSI; Andrews, Robinson & Hoge, 1984) and the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI; Hoge & Andrews, 2002) extend the principles of LS, including responsivity, to juvenile offenders.”
- Assessment of Reoffense Risk in Adolescents Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses (2009, unknown): “…the psychometric properties of the YLS/CMI (e.g., Catchpole & Gretton, 2003; Edens et al., 2007; Holsinger, Lowenkamp, & Latessa, 2006; Marshall, Egan, English, & Jones, 2006; Onifade et al., 2008; Schmidt, Hoge, & Gomes, 2005; Schwalbe, 2007; Thompson & Pope, 2005; for a review see Hoge, 2005).”
- Comparative Analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in Adolescent Offenders: A 10-year Follow-Up Into Adulthood (2011, background): “In another study, Onifade et al. (2008) found that, beyond moderately high scores, the YLS/CMI was not a sensitive predictor of recidivism.”
- The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment (2006, unknown): “With an early version of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI; Hoge & Andrews, 2002), rated gains on intermediate criminogenic targets were more strongly correlated with reduced recidivism among higher risk cases than with lower risk cases.”
- The Relationship Between Matching Service to Criminogenic Need and Recidivism in Male and Female Youth (2012, background): “Consistent with the findings of several previous studies (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003; Jung & Rawana, 1999; Olver et al., 2009; Onifade et al., 2008), youth’s YLS/CMI scores significantly predicted recidivism for the entire sample and remained predictive when examined separately for males and females.”