The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents

By G. Carlo, B. A. Randall. 2002

869 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/222a4340e2d2ea2c4c3a44cc0962aa0cfc3ae4b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Health

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

How Supportive of Their Specific Purposes Do Youth Believe Their Family and Friends Are? (2013, background): “The reason need not be selfsacrificial; there are many ways to be prosocial (Carlo & Randall, 2002).”
The Two Dimensions of Motivation and a Reciprocal Model of the Creative Process (2013, background): “In addition, while many previous researchers have developed measures of prosocial and altruistic behavior (e.g., Carlo & Randall, 2002; Chadwick, Bromgard, Bromgard, & Trafimow, 2006; Rushton, Chrisjohn, & Fekken, 1981), personality (e.g., Penner, Fritzsche, Craiger, & Freifeld, 1995), and moral…”
A Latent Growth Curve Analysis of Prosocial Behavior Among Rural Adolescents (2007, methodology): “Adequate psychometric properties of the PPAAUS subscales were documented previously (e.g., Carlo & Randall, 2002; Crockett & Bingham, 2000; Jacobson & Crockett, 2000).”
Empathizing With Others’ Pain Versus Empathizing With Others’ Joy: Examining the Separability of Positive and Negative Empathy and Their Relation to Different Types of Social Behaviors and Social Emotions (2015, neutral): “Specifically, Morelli, Lieberman, Telzer, and Zaki (as cited in Morelli, Lieberman, & Zaki, 2015) showed that dispositional positive empathy was strongly related to dispositional prosociality as measured by the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (Carlo & Randall, 2002), a measure that asks primarily about”
Dimensions of Conscience in Mid-adolescence: Links with Social Behavior, Parenting, and Temperament (2008, methodology): “To measure their prosocial behavior, adolescents were asked to complete the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM, Carlo et al. 2003; Carlo and Randall 2002 ).”
Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt (2007, methodology): “This 9-item state measure was inspired by a 23-item trait cooperation measure, the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (Carlo & Randall, 2002 ).”
Empathy as a mediator of the relations between parent and peer attachment and prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors in Mexican American college students (2012, methodology): “This link is in accord with other research that suggests that public prosocial behaviors are unlike the other forms of prosocial behaviors examined in that they are more egoistically motivated and oriented towards gaining other peoples’ approval than meeting their needs (Carlo & Randall, 2002).”
Malevolent Creativity: Does Personality Influence Malicious Divergent Thinking? (2011, background): “Accordingly, sympathetic individuals have been shown to exhibit more altruistic behaviors (Carlo & Randall, 2002; Oswald, 1996; Unger & Thumuluri, 1997), less aggression (Carlo, Raffaelli, Laible, & Meyer, 1999), and lower risk of future violence (Perez-Albeniz & de Paul, 2003) than their less…”
The Impact of Maternal Relationship Quality on Emerging Adults’ Prosocial Tendencies: Indirect Effects via Regulation of Prosocial Values (2008, methodology): “Factor analysis on this scale has revealed a distinct factor structure (Carlo et al. 2003; Carlo and Randall 2002); thus, this 25-item measure is composed of six subscales of context-specific prosocial tendencies: public (four items, a = .87, sample item, ‘‘I can help others best when people are…”
Sociocognitive and Behavioral Correlates of a Measure of Prosocial Tendencies for Adolescents (2003, background): “Th e Prosocial Tendencies Mea- sure (PTM) originally was developed to assess self-report of six types of prosocial behaviors among college individuals (Carlo & Randall, 2002).”
Is It Bad to Be Good? An Exploration of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Subtypes in Adolescence (2004, neutral): “, Hay, 1994), and seems even more selfishly motivated than Carlo and Randall’s public prosocial behavior (Carlo and Randall, 2002).”
Flourishing and Floundering in Emerging Adult College Students (2013, methodology): “Prosocial behaviors were assessed using the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM), which has been used in the past with both adolescents and emerging adults and has displayed adequate internal reliability and validity (Carlo, Hausmann, Christiansen, & Randall, 2003; Carlo & Randall, 2002).”
Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. (2011, background): “Chaurand and Brauer (2008) found felt responsibility was the most important correlate of people saying they would exercise some form of informal social control when they witnessed violations of community norms (e.”