Natural Law and Practical Rationality

By M. Murphy. 2001

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/216a50948ed90b726aaee5377f646c262f5b7aaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Theresa A. Gannon
2. Tony Ward
3. R. Mann
4. W. L. Marshall
5. Mark Brown
6. E. Weaver
7. F. McNeill
8. A. Beech

Citations in the corpus

• Good lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A bridging theory (2004, background): “There is a consensus (in Western culture at least) regarding the lists of primary human goods noted in psychological and social science research (Cummins, 1996; Emmons, 1999), evolutionary theory (Arnhart, 1998), practical ethics (Murphy, 2001), and philosophical anthropology (Nussbaum, 2000; Resche”
• Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders (2006, background): “We have identified ten groups of primary goods from the psychological, biological, and anthropological research literature (see Aspinwall & Staudinger, 2003; Cummins, 1996; Deci & Ryan, 2000; Emmons, 1999; Linley & Joseph, 2004; Murphy, 2001; Nussbaum, 2000; Rescher, 1990).”
• Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “This objection states that the RNR model, by virtue of its radical behavioral assumptions, assumes a narrow view of human nature and ignores the fact that as evolved, biologically embodied organisms, humans naturally seek and require certain goods in order to live fulfilling and personally satisfyin”
• The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation (2004, background): “These domains include psychological and social science research (Cummins, 1996; Emmons, 1999), evolutionary theory (Arnhart, 1998), practical ethics (Murphy, 2001), and philosophical anthropology (Rescher, 1990; Nussbaum, 2000).”
• The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications (2007, background): “The psychological, biological, and anthropological research literature indicates that there are at least ten groups of primary human goods (Aspinwall & Staudinger, 2003; Cummins, 1996; Deci & Ryan, 2000; Emmons, 1999; Linley & Joseph, 2004; Murphy, 2001; Nussbaum, 2000): life (including healthy livi”