Good lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A bridging theory

By Tony Ward, W. L. Marshall. 2004

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff9d3e31399c1f109075992daedd1a8bebc3bdff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. G. Willis
2. E. Weaver
3. F. McNeill
4. Theresa A. Gannon
5. Tony Ward
6. Jan Looman
7. J. Abracen
8. Mayumi Purvis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Willis
2. F. McNeill
3. E. Weaver
4. Theresa A. Gannon
5. Jan Looman
6. J. Abracen
7. Mayumi Purvis
8. Tony Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management (2010, methodology): “The GLM represents a relatively recent development in the field (Ward and Brown, 2004; Ward and Marshall, 2004; Ward and Gannon, 2006; Ward, Gannon and Mann, 2007).”
• Self-esteem, shame, cognitive distortions and empathy in sexual offenders: their integration and treatment implications (2009, background): “Consistent with these views, we (Marshall, Marshall, Serran, & O'Brien, in press ) see sexual offender treatment as having three phases: (1) an engagement and motivational stage involving treating the offender respectfully, enhancing his self-esteem, reducing his shame, and teaching him some basic ”
• The Good Lives Model in Practice: Offence Pathways and Case Management (2011, background): “Following an extensive review of psychological, social, biological, and anthropological research, Ward and colleagues (e.g., Ward and Brown 2004; Ward and Marshall 2004) first proposed nine classes of primary goods.”
• Examining the process of offender change: the transition to crime desistance (2009, background): “Antisocial behaviours limit offenders’ ability to grasp the long-term advantages of cooperation; by nature, criminal behaviour seeks shortcuts to goods and power and disregards interpersonal trust and stability (Ward & Marshall, 2004).”
• The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, background): “From the GLM perspective criminogenic needs are internal or external obstacles that frustrate and block the acquisition of primary human goods (Ward & Marshall, 2004).”
• Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders (2006, background): “…specify the aims of therapy, provide a justification of these aims in terms of its core assumptions about etiology and the values underpinning the approach, identify clinical targets, and outline how treatment should proceed in the light of these assumptions and goals (Ward & Marshall, 2004).”
• Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “…specify the aims of therapy, provide a justification of these aims in terms of its core assumptions about etiology and the values underpinning the approach, identify clinical targets, and outline how treatment should proceed in the light of these assumptions and goals (Ward & Marshall, 2004).”