The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications

By Tony Ward, R. Mann, Theresa A. Gannon. 2007

507 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32b018d60c76194524fd4de49bf19ce783f7fde3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. G. Willis
2. F. Cullen
3. Mayumi Purvis
4. A. Day
5. Kathy Lewis
6. StephenC. P. Wong
7. Deqiang Gu
8. Audrey Gordon

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Willis
2. Mayumi Purvis
3. A. Day
4. F. Cullen
5. Kathy Lewis
6. StephenC. P. Wong
7. Deqiang Gu
8. Audrey Gordon

Citations in the corpus

• Human Agency and Explanations of Criminal Desistance: Arguments for a Rational Choice Theory (2015, unknown): “[79] Good Lives Model.”
• Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, methodology): “Drawing also from positive psychology, the most developed of these approaches is the Good Lives Model set forth by Tony Ward and his colleagues (see, e.g., Ward, Mann, and Gannon 2007; Ward and Marshall 2007; Ward and Maruna 2007; Whitehead, Ward, and Collie 2007).”
• The Effectiveness of Violence Reduction Treatment for Psychopathic Offenders: Empirical Evidence and a Treatment Model (2012, background): “The notion that treatment of psychopathy should focus on both the reduction of violence and criminality and the management of treatment interfering behaviors of psychopathic offenders was first set forth by Wong and Hare (2005) although not in the form of a model with two components.”
• The Good Lives Model in Practice: Offence Pathways and Case Management (2011, methodology): “Ward et al. (2007) outlined a group-based application of the GLM based on seven modules typical of current best-practice sex offender treatment programmes: establishing therapy norms, understanding offending and cognitive restructuring, dealing with deviant arousal, victim impact and empathy…”
• Offender emotion and self-regulation: implications for offender rehabilitation programming (2009, background): “This would suggest that emotional states can act as important markers of risk, although the relationship between primary goods and criminogenic needs represents an area where much more empirical research is needed (see Ward, Mann, & Gannon, 2007 ).”