Embedded trust: Control and learning

By Vincent Buskens, W. Raub. 2002

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2104ad31ab87683b3642175a502cee0d760c675a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations (2007, background): “2 Molm 1997; Stolte, Fine and Cook 2001; Buskens and Raub 2002; Simpson 2004; Horne 2004; Diekman 2004).”
Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members (2009, unknown): “Vignettes have been used in numerous studies of trust (e.g., [20, 40, 102]) and in the study of collaboration (e.g., [3, 28, 62]).”
With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support (2012, unknown): “The social and reputational benefits of engaging in supportive behaviors increase with network density, and, therefore, colleagues embedded in dense networks also have a stronger incentive to provide supportive behaviors than colleagues embedded in sparse networks (Buskens & Raub, 2002).”
Reputation Formation and the Evolution of Cooperation in Anonymous Online Markets (2014, unknown): “Factors such as the degree of traders’ social embeddedness (Buskens and Raub 2002; DiMaggio and Louch 1998; Granovetter 1992), the type of commodity (Kollock 1994), the complexity of the interaction (Jones et al. 1997), and, most importantly, the lack of timely and inexpensive information about a…”
Beyond Altruism: Sociological Foundations of Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior (2015, unknown): “…least generous toward more distal others or strangers (Apicella et al. 2012, Baldassarri & Grossman 2013, Leider et al. 2009). information about others’ trustworthiness through ties that connect group members (Buskens & Raub 2002) and by shaping levels of trust in strangers (Macy & Skvoretz 1998).”