The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial

By Lena Winslott-Hiselius, K. Brundell-Freij, Å. Vagland, C. Byström. 2009

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21017345a73e1b13945c944ef48c53ce8d45fb08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Lessons from the Stockholm congestion charging trial (2008, background): “(By gender (left), from Bystrom and Vagland, 2007; by residential area (right), from Winslott-Hiselius et al, 2008 ).”
The unexpected "yes!" : Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm (2011, background): “1 To what extent this change in opinion depended on benefits being larger than expected remains an open question: there is evidence, however, that this cannot be the sole reason (Winslott-Hiselius et al., 2009; Brundell-Freij and Jonsson, 2009).”
Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, methodology): “They suggest that “trials, generally, may be a more useful tool than information in the process of implementing ‘difficult’ policy measures, such as congestion charges” (Winslott-Hiselius et al., 2009).”
Reducing Urban Road Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice (2011, unknown): “According to Winslott-Hiselius et al. (2009), people changed their attitudes toward the Stockholm program as it became clear that the congestion charge would likely become permanent.”
Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2010, background): “Previous studies showed that the congestion charge in Stockholm was more acceptable after the trial period than beforehand (Stockholmförsöket, 2006; Winslott-Hiselius et al., 2009).”