A Measure of College Student Course Engagement
By Mitchell M. Handelsman, W. Briggs, N. Sullivan, Annette Towler. 2005
801 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2098c376a2d4f0d4c52f687b2c0faff4e1d08a74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Erick T. Baloran
- Jenny T. Hernan
- Janice S. Taoy
- Gary L. Hunter
- S. Jeyaraj
- Virgil Zeigler‐Hill
- J. Gray
- S. Gunuc
Citations in the corpus
- Does Involvement Really Matter? Indicators of College Student Success and Satisfaction (2013, result): “…from interactions with faculty and diverse peers, institutional emphasis on supportive interactions with faculty, staff, and students, and engagement in community service confirm previous findings by Handelsman et al. (2005), Pike, Kuh, and Massa-McKinley (2008), and Umbach and Wawrynski (2005).”
- COURSE SATISFACTION AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING AMID COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (2021, result): “The result of the study is consistent with the statement by Handelsman et al. (2005), which stressed that students devote time and energy to online learning in terms of skills engagement, emotional engagement, participation engagement, and performance engagement, all of which represent students’…”
- Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). (2015, methodology): “As previously mentioned, Handelsman et al.’s (2005) survey does not conceive of engagement as one characteristic or only as behaviors but as based on multiple factors: skills engagement (what students “do”); emotional engagement (how connected they feel to the course/content, which is especially…”
- Assessment of Student Engagement in Higher Education: A Synthesis of Literature and Assessment Tools (2015, background): “As highlighted by Handelsman et al. (2005) the SCEQ provides a more comprehensive understanding of student engagement and fosters insight beyond what is visible in behavioral observations of classroom engagement.”
- Student Engagement and Marketing Classes (2011, background): “The measure of a student’s participation in a learning task Charles, Bustard, and Black (2009) Improvements in class attendance, the completion of certain tasks, grade improvement, and number of questions in class Engagement is characterized by intrinsic motivation, positive affect, persistence, eff”
- The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Classroom Engagement in Teaching English. (2018, background): “Classroom engagement, which is one of the important factors to create an effective learning environment, is considered as an indicator of student achievement (Handelsman et al., 2005).”
- The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments (2016, background): “The Student Course Engagement Questionnaire (SCEQ) includes items for each of the four kinds of engagement and provides self-reported results that extend what can be observed in classroom interactions (Handelsman et al., 2005).”