Residential mobility and opportunities: Early impacts of the moving to opportunity demonstration program in Chicago

By E. Rosenbaum, Laura E. Harris. 2001

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Explaining housing preference and choice: The role of self-congruity and functional congruity (2005, background): “Further, the Gautreaux and the Moving-to-Opportunity demonstration programs in Chicago (USA) found that residents who move to the suburbs rather than city neighborhoods are significantly more likely to find employment and attain higher levels of education (Rosenbaum, 1995; Rosenbaum and Harris, 200”
The Dynamics of Unhealthy Housing in the UK: A Panel Data Analysis (2008, background): “The ability to move in order to escape from poor home and neighbourhood conditions has been linked to better health (Ross et al., 2000; Stokols & Shumaker, 1982) and linked with improved housing and neighbourhood conditions (especially safety) in the US (Katz et al., 2001; Rosenbaum & Harris, 2001).”
What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate? (2006, background): “Rosenbaum, Harris, and Denton (2003) and Rosenbaum and Harris (2000, 2001) compared controls with Chicago families in the Section 8 and experimental groups who moved.”
Poverty, Housing Niches, and Health in the United States (2003, background): “Evaluations from Boston, Chicago, and New York all found that both mover groups described their new neighborhoods as physically better and safer (Katz, Kling, & Liebman, 2001; Leventhal & BrooksGunn, in press; Rosenbaum & Harris, 2001, 2002).”