The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory?
By Michael L. Mueller, John Dunlosky, Sarah K. Tauber, Matthew G. Rhodes. 2014
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20105124563472bd03ded9404ef27581289603f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- How beliefs can impact judgments of learning: Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency (2017, background): “…fluency (but see Experiment 8) for two reasons: Prior research has established that people believe processing fluency is related to memory (e.g., Mueller et al., 2014) and fluency has received a great deal of attention in recent research on JOLs (e.g., Besken, 2016; Hu et al., 2015; Jia et…”
- Judgments of learning: Methods, data, and theory. (2016, background): “Nelson, Leonesio, Landwehr, & Narens, 1986). Indeed, it is not apparent whether these alternative judgments induce participants to consider different kinds of information about memory or reflect a variation in judgment based on the same information (Dunlosky & Tauber, 2013). For example, Serra and E”