Conceptual Analysis and Measurement of Adolescent Autonomy

By M. Noom, Maja Dekovic, W. Meeus. 2001

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fefe693915b64fea390331bb189b9e5c48ee25c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Luc Goossens
2. W. Beyers

In Clinical Psychology

1. W. Beyers
2. Luc Goossens
3. I. Vansant
4. E. Moors
5. Mickey C. Melendez
6. Bart Soenens
7. Maarten Vansteenkiste
8. Dirk T. Tempelaar

In Social Psychology

1. Luc Goossens
2. I. Vansant
3. W. Beyers
4. E. Moors
5. Bilal Zia
6. Maarten Vansteenkiste
7. Bart Soenens
8. Richard M. Ryan

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of High School Financial Education: Evidence from a Large-Scale Evaluation in Brazil (2016, background): “Noom et al. (2001) synthesize autonomy into attitudinal, emotional, and functional parts.”
• A Structural Model of Autonomy in Middle and Late Adolescence: Connectedness, Separation, Detachment, and Agency (2003, methodology): “Two subscales of the Mannheim Individuation Questionnaire (MIQ; Hofer et al., 1992; Noack and Puschner, 1999 ) were hypothesized to be measures of Connectedness in the relationship with parents during late adolescence.”