Making sense of mentoring or mentoring making sense? Reflections on the mentoring process by adult mentors with young people†

By K. Philip, L. Hendry. 2000

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fbd83b6369e11ad1d451174ccef54c3caf1cb5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. G. Crisp
2. Stine Thidemann Faber
3. Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt
4. Melinda Karp
5. S. Gershenfeld
6. Esau Tovar

In Social Psychology

1. G. Crisp
2. Therese A. Huston
3. Stine Thidemann Faber
4. Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt
5. Melinda Karp
6. Esau Tovar
7. S. Gershenfeld

In Speech and Hearing

1. G. Crisp

Citations in the corpus

• Benefits of Peer Mentoring to Mentors, Female Mentees and Higher Education Institutions (2016, background): “There is hence, a lack of a widely accepted definition (Crisp & Cruz, 2009; Miller, 2002; Zimmerman & Paul, 2007) and of a theory to explain the roles and functions involved in mentoring (Haring, 1999; Jacobi, 1991; Philip & Hendry, 2000).”
• Conceptualization and Initial Validation of the College Student Mentoring Scale (CSMS) (2009, background): “One of the greatest weaknesses of mentoring programs has been the lack of a conceptual base to support the structure of the program (Haring, 1999) because the theoretical base of mentoring has not been properly examined (Philip & Hendry, 2000).”
• A Qualitative Method for Assessing Faculty Satisfaction (2005, background): “(3) Mentoring Mentoring potentially provides support that many new faculty need to survive and flourish in academe (Boice, 1992; Boyle and Boice, 1998; Bowen and Shuster, 1986; Murray, 1991; Philip and Hendry, 2000).”