Xylem cavitation and hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.)

By S. Salleo, A. Nardini, Franco Pitt, M. Gullo. 2000

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f5d881c5ce6859196d584e53a1299cbf6d7ff0c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. L. Sack
2. N. Michele Holbrook
3. Jaume Flexas
4. Tim J. Brodribb
5. H. Medrano
6. K. Cao
7. M. M. Chaves
8. H. Cochard

In Plant Science

1. L. Sack
2. Jaume Flexas
3. H. Medrano
4. N. Michele Holbrook
5. Tim J. Brodribb
6. M. M. Chaves
7. J. Galmés
8. K. Cao

Citations in the corpus

• Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery (2007, unknown): “The present results support that gs variations during water stress are highly determined by hydraulic conductance in Mediterranean species, as already suggested (Salleo et al. 2000; Serrano and Peñuelas 2005).”
• Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance correlate with leaf vein embolism in Cercis siliquastrum L. (2003, background): “When the hydraulic conductance of this pathway was reduced experimentally or by xylem embolism, gL turned out to be downregulated, thus buffering xylem water potential above critical values leading to catastrophic xylem failure (Tyree and Sperry 1988; Sperry et al. 1993; Salleo et al. 2000 ).”
• Relationship between growth rates and xylem hydraulic characteristics in young, mature and old-growth ponderosa pine trees (2003, background): “Stomata close to maintain leaf Y above a critical level that would cause irreversible embolism (Cochard, Bréda & Granier 1996; Salleo et al. 2000).”
• Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. (2003, background): “But evidence is accumulating that suggests that stomata respond to changes in the rate of water supply, through, for example, changes in xylem conductance (Salleo et al. 2000; Sperry 2000; Nardini et al. 2001).”
• Differentiation of leaf water flux and drought tolerance traits in hemiepiphytic and non-hemiepiphytic Ficus tree species (2010, background): “The higher growth rates of plants dominatingmore humid environments comparedwith species subject to frequent drought may be partially explained by their higher hydraulic conductivity that affects the uptake of water from the soil, higher stomatal conductance and higher CO2 assimilation rates (Salleo”
• The Physiology of Adaptation and Yield Expression in Olive (2010, background): “There is also the suggestion that the hydraulic shock from individual embolisms may play a role in regulating stomatal conductance (Salleo et al. 2000) and that the release of water may contribute significantly to the capacitance of the xylem tissue (Meinzer et al. 2001).”
• Species-specific water use by forest tree species: from the tree to the stand (2012, background): “…results are frequently signed for most forest tree species, and points out to the complex interplay between maintenance of the water supply to leaves and the risk of hydraulic failure from tensions developed within the xylem (Meinzer et al., 2009; Salleo et al., 2000; Tyree and Sperry, 1988).”
• Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results (2002, methodology): “It is a relation between the tension of the sap in the xylem conduits and the corresponding degree of embolism as estimated by acoustic detection [79, 96, 100, 126] or, much more frequently, by a hydraulic method [107].”
• An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. (2010, background): “Tight correlations have been evidenced between water potential thresholds for stomatal conductance and xylem embolism across species from contrasted agroecological environments (Sperry 1986; Cochard et al. 1996a; Cochard, Ridolfi & Dreyer 1996b; Salleo et al. 2000; Cochard 2002; Lemoine, Cochard & G”
• Stomatal Closure during Leaf Dehydration, Correlation with Other Leaf Physiological Traits1 (2003, background): “This work follows a number of studies that have demonstrated similarity between the response of both stomatal conductance (gs) and stem xylem cavitation to decreasing l (Salleo et al., 2000; Hubbard et al., 2001; Cochard et al., 2002).”
• Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update (2010, background): “(Salleo et al. 2000), itmaybe argued that these cultivars present a fine co-regulation of gs and leaf hydraulic conductivity, allowing them to avoid cavitation.”
• Hydraulic and photosynthetic co‐ordination in seasonally dry tropical forest trees (2002, background): “A number of recent articles have illustrated linkages between the control of leaf water loss and the hydraulic supply of water under laboratory conditions or during manipulations of trees (Sperry, Alder & Eastlack 1993; Salleo et al. 2000; Hubbard et al. 2001).”
• Xylem vessel diameter as a factor in resistance of Ulmus minor to Ophiostoma novo‐ulmi (2002, background): “It is probable that initial cavitation by DED is produced in large diameter vessels, as it is by water stress (LO GULLO et al. 1995; SALLEO et al. 2000) or by frost (SPERRY et al.”
• Leaf hydraulics. (2006, background): “, owing to dehydration), leaf will similarly decline, and stomata will close as, or before, leaf becomes damaging, leading to reduction of gs and E (32, 108).”