Stomatal Closure during Leaf Dehydration, Correlation with Other Leaf Physiological Traits1
By Tim J. Brodribb, N. Michele Holbrook. Plant Physiology, 2003
719 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e09d2538c0a155dd9c0473ad1cc21e5c5c261a30
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
- L. Sack
- Tim J. Brodribb
- N. Michele Holbrook
- K. Cao
- Jaume Flexas
- Gabriel G. Katul
- Giulia Vico
- Amilcare Porporato
In Plant Science
- L. Sack
- Tim J. Brodribb
- Jaume Flexas
- H. Medrano
- J. Galmés
- Amilcare Porporato
- Giulia Vico
- N. Michele Holbrook
Citations in the corpus
- Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery (2007, background): “The regulation of KL depends on cavitation and recovery of xylem vessels, from which leaf veins seem the most sensitive (Cochard et al. 2002; Brodribb and Holbrook 2003).”
- Mistletoe ecophysiology: Host-parasite interactions (2009, background): “The opening and closing of stomates is homeostatically controlled by leaf-xylem water potential: when more water is lost than supplied by host xylem, water potential drops which triggers stomatal closure (Brodribb and Holbrook 2003; Brodribb et al. 2003).”
- Differentiation of leaf water flux and drought tolerance traits in hemiepiphytic and non-hemiepiphytic Ficus tree species (2010, methodology): “…m )2 MPa)1) was determined by fitting the linear relation of 1 ⁄ Wl vs. RWC before turgor loss and was normalized by leaf area (Koide et al. 1991; Brodribb & Holbrook 2003): Cleaf¼DRWC=DWl ðDM=LAÞ ðWM=DMÞ=M eqn 3 where LA is leaf area (m2), WM the leaf water mass at 100% RWC (WM = FM)DM, in g)…”
- The spatial pattern of air seeding thresholds in mature sugar maple trees (2005, methodology): “This is consistent with the notion that stomatal closure may be linked to cavitation in leaf veins and often precedes substantial loss of hydraulic conductivity ( Brodribb & Holbrook 2003 ).”
- Hydraulic properties and photosynthetic rates in co-occurring lianas and trees in a seasonal tropical rainforest in southwestern China (2009, methodology): “The relationship between leaf water potential (WL) and relative water content (RWC) was quantified using bench drying technique (Lenz et al. 2006; Brodribb and Holbrook 2003) in mid-wet season (August) and early dry season (November).”
- Viewing leaf structure and evolution from a hydraulic perspective (2010, background): “Conservatism in the functioning of guard cells of most terrestrial plants prevents leaf water potentials from falling below –2 to –3MPa before stomata initiate closure (Brodribb and Holbrook 2003; Jacobsen et al. 2008).”
- Biological constraints on water transport in the soil–plant–atmosphere system (2013, methodology): “The capacitance CP has been estimated experimentally from the slope of the water retention curves in stems [63,64] and leaves [65–70].”
- Leaf hydraulics. (2006, background): “The protection conferred will vary according to species, because species differ in whether whole leaves, petioles, and midribs are more (17, 22, 28, 49, 84, 105, 108, 125), equally (33), or less (32, 49, 83, 122) vulnerable to loss of conductance compared with the stem as leaf declines (and xylem te”
- Integrated responses of hydraulic architecture, water and carbon relations of western hemlock to dwarf mistletoe infection (2004, background): “More recent evidence suggests that stomata respond to rapid ch,'mges in leaf kL associated with daily cycles of embolism and its reversal within the leaf ( Brodribb & Holbrook 2003; Nardini & Salleo 2003; Trifil6 el al. 2003).”
- Trait selection and community weighting are key to understanding ecosystem responses to changing precipitation regimes (2018, background): “Thus, the inclusion of these traits related to water transport (leaf, stem or root maximum hydraulic conductance—Kmax) and drought tolerance (leaf turgor loss point (ψTLP) and vulnerability to xylem cavitation) allows for better understanding of plant responses to both high and low levels of water a”
- Life in the treetops: ecophysiological strategies of canopy epiphytes in a tropical montane cloud forest (2015, background): “…on live cells and the evaluation of the water potential at which cell walls collapse (i.e., the turgor loss point, wTLP) is another trait that is used to evaluate resistance to drought (Niinemets 2001, Brodribb and Holbrook 2003, Lenz et al. 2006, Blackman et al. 2010, Bartlett et al. 2012).”
- Diurnal depression of leaf hydraulic conductance in a tropical tree species (2004, methodology): “Leaf age has been shown to produce a strong effect on both K leaf and photosystem II (PSII) electron transport capacity (Brodribb & Holbrook 2003a), and as such it was imperative to use replicate trees with identical leaf age structure.”