An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application
By David A. Hensher, P. Stopher, Jordan J. Louviere. 2001
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f206d39dce55f838bd202bd3a1d716d9c8dfcf2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- S. B. Olsen
- Fredrik Carlsson
- David A. Hensher
- Jette Bredahl Jacobsen
- Peter Martinsson
- B. Thorsen
- L. Persson
- Thomas Lundhede
In Transportation
- S. B. Olsen
- Jette Bredahl Jacobsen
- B. Thorsen
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Peter Martinsson
- Thomas Lundhede
- L. Persson
- David A. Hensher
Citations in the corpus
- Complexity in Choice Experiments: Choice of the Status Quo Alternative and Implications for Welfare Measurement (2009, background): “Hensher et al. (2001) attempted to determine if respondents exhibited fatigue as they complete CEs of varying lengths.”
- Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why* (2008, unknown): “For example, the number of alternatives within the task (Hensher et al. 2001), the number of attributes (Pullman et al. 1999), the number of attributes and alternatives (DeShazo and Fermo 2002; Arentze et al. 2003), the impact of attribute level range upon response (Cooke and Mellers 1995; Ohler et…”
- To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes (2012, background): “See Hensher et al. (2001) and Carlsson and Martinsson (2008) for a discussion of the issues regarding the number of choice sets.”
- Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty (2009, background): “…on the scale parameters dependence on variables like choice c mplexity, effort and fatigue (Bradley and Daly, 1994; Swait and Adamowicz, 2001; Hensher et al., 2001; DeShazo and Fermo, 2002; Sælensminde, 2001), as well as demographic variables of the respondents (Louviere and Hensher, 2001;…”
- How Much is Too Much? (2008, background): “Our results are in line with the discussion in Louviere (2004), i.e. that respondents can answer many choice sets, which was supported empirically by Hensher et al. (2001).”
- Does it Matter When a Power Outage Occurs? - A Choice Experiment Study on the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Power Outages (2008, methodology): “Before they answered the 8 For example, Hensher et al. (2001) tested whether a different number of choice sets (4, 8, 16, 24 and 32) affected the estimated elasticity for choosing between flights, and they found small differences relating to the number of choice sets, while Hensher (2003) found…”
- Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment (2006, background): “The most ‘popular’ design variation is in the number of attributes and alternatives (eg DeShazo and Fermo 2001), in variations in the range of a fixed number of attributes (eg White et al 1998, Ohler et al 2000, Hensher 2001a) or variations in the number of choice sets (eg Hensher et al 2001).”