Gender Differences in Coping Strategies in Children and Adolescents

By Heike Eschenbeck, C. Kohlmann, Arnold Lohaus. 2007

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e764e3d5a3144b3f530f9cf97aeb5273b78c8fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Cámara
2. Patricia Padilla
3. G. Bacigalupe
4. Catherine P. Bradshaw
5. T. Waasdorp

In Education

1. M. Cámara
2. Patricia Padilla
3. Catherine P. Bradshaw
4. T. Waasdorp

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Cámara
2. C. Bradley
3. Tina Maschi
4. G. Bacigalupe
5. K. Morgen
6. Catherine P. Bradshaw

Citations in the corpus

• Development of Coping Strategies From Childhood to Adolescence: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Trends (2018, background): “…often include normative social stressors (e.g., conflict with a friend) and normative academic stressors (e.g., difficult exam or too much homework; Causey & Dubow, 1992; Eschenbeck et al., 2007; Hampel & Petermann, 2005; for a review, see Compas et al., 2001) as ego-threatening situations.”
• Emotional reactions and regulatory responses to negative and positive events: Associations with attachment and gender (2010, unknown): “This pattern is consistent with evidence showing that gender is more relevant for responses to interpersonal than impersonal situations ( Eschenbeck et al. 2007 ).”
• The role of social support in adolescents: are you helping me or stressing me out? (2017, background): “Previous studies had already found that, when coping with stress, girls are more prone to seek social support (Eschenbeck et al., 2007; Lynch et al., 2007; Murray-Harvey & Slee, 2007; Piko, 2011) than boys who rather try to get distracted by different activities (Gómez-Fraguela et al., 2006).”
• Examining student responses to frequent bullying: A latent class approach. (2011, background): “Given that girls are more likely to respond to stressors through support-seeking behaviors (Eschenbeck et al., 2007), the social damage that occurs as a result of indirect victimization may lead girls to utilize other response strategies that are less adaptive, such as getting in an argument or bull”
• Exploring Gender Differences on Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior Among Maltreated Youth: Implications for Social Work Action (2008, background): “While youth may experience similar adverse effects to trauma, the literature suggests critical distinctions between boys and girls, particularly around gender specific coping responses ( Eschenbeck et al. 2007 ).”