Defining Open Source Software Project Success
By Kevin Crowston, Hala Annabi, James Linton Howison. International Conference on Interaction Sciences, 2003
360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e4e5fd34272c9cfff0cc794736d2f6f90050661
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Greta L. Polites
- Nicholas H. Roberts
- Yulin Fang
- Jungpil Hahn
- Jason Bennett Thatcher
- Rajdeep Grewal
- Derrick J. Neufeld
- Jae Yun Moon
Citations in the corpus
- Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems (2006, methodology): “…which should relate to product use, particularly when software is distributed through a single channel as in the case of SourceForge.net (e.g., Crowston et al. 2003) All of the " new products " that emerge from the Perl Foundry are in the same general market; hence, most of the…”
- Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects (2009, background): “Despite the notable success stories, many more OSS projects have failed, frequently due to insufficient volunteer participation [13, 27, 37].”
- The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams (2006, background): “As with the study of commercial software development contexts, it is important in the open source context to consider a multidimensional view of team effectiveness (Crowston et al. 2003).”
- Emergence of New Project Teams from Open Source Software Developer Networks: Impact of Prior Collaboration Ties (2008, methodology): “7 See Crowston et al. (2003) for other measures of OSS success.”
- Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: a review and guidelines for their use (2012, background): “Similarly, team effectiveness has been viewed as multidimensional in nature (Crowston et al, 2003), yet its dimensions have also been operationalized as separate constructs with single-item measures (Stewart & Gosain, 2006).”